The Mechanical Magic of the Movies

Asa Butterfield in “Hugo”

Film Friday

Our family attended Martin Scorcese’s magical new film Hugo last week and found ourselves deep in nostalgia-ville.  My parents recalled a sabbatical year when they lived just a couple of blocks from Paris’s Gare Montparnasse, the train station where most of the action in the film takes place. I, meanwhile, was taken back to another sabbatical year, 1965-66, when my brothers and I made regular trips to Paris’s fabled Cinémathèque.

Hugo is set in the 1920′s, and many of the films we saw were silent films from that era.  I remember watching Harold Loyd movies (a scene where Lloyd hangs from a clock in the breathtaking Safety Last appears in the film), as well as films starring Ben Turpin, Laurel and Hardy, Fatty Arbuckle, Buster Keaton (with titles in Czech—curator Henri Langlois scavenged films from wherever he could find them), and Douglas Fairbanks (in the obscure Don Q, Son of Zorro).  The theater was small and carpeted and we would sit in the front row so that we could stretch out on the carpeting. It was one of the greatest years of my life.

We didn’t see (and would probably have found boring if we had) any films by George Méliès, who is the subject of Hugo. When the Lumière Brothers invented the movies in 1895, they regarded it as just a recording eye.  It took a former magician like Méliès, coming immediately after them, to realize that he could play visual tricks with the medium. In film history courses we talk about the Lumière Brothers representing cinema’s documentary impulse and Méliès representing its fantasy impulse.

Roger Ebert makes the point that few directors have used the new 3-D technology as well as Scorcese does in the film, and I think the reason is because Scorcese has caught the Méliès spirit. Méliès delighted in using special effects to show voyagers journeying to the moon, exploring the ocean sea depths, or encountering demons inside caves.  In the same vein, Scorcese delights in seeing what the new technology can do.

This is somewhat startling because one doesn’t normally associate Scorcese with with either fantasy or dazzling special effects–not with films like Mean Streets, Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, and Cape Fear to his credit. But any feature film director is aware that something magical happens between the mechanical recording of the camera and the final product. Scorcese focuses a lot on mechanics, showing us the internal workings of the clocks in the train station (which sometimes resemble film projectors) and of a mechanical robot that Hugo is trying to fix. Seen through 3-D glasses, these machines become wondrous.

Hugo is filled with testimonials to the history of film. At one point I found myself thinking of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis since he too strove to create vast interior worlds and he too had a robot, although one less benign. I thought of Fernand Leger’s surrealist dance of objects in Ballet mécanique and Rene Clair’s factory in À nous la liberté. There were a couple of Bergmanesque dream sequences (a la Wild Strawberries). And I thought of how the French poetic realism of the 1930’s—about which the French wax nostalgic—was itself nostalgic for this period in the 1920’s.

There is also a touch of the Wizard of Oz, especially the Tin Man.  First there Hugo’s robot, which lacks a heart-shaped key.  There is also a policeman with a mechanical leg and an emotionally bruised heart who is trying to catch Hugo. (As Hugo’s friend Isabelle points out, he is like inspector Javert tracking Jean Valjean in Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables –in case we miss the origin of Hugo’s name.)

By paying tribute to Méliès, Scorcese is expressing his heartfelt gratitude for the motion picture art that allowed him his own expression.  Scorcese may see himself in the movie’s film professor who is excited to discover that Méliès is still alive.  This is the most sentimental Scorcese film I’ve seen.

One other personal note: The magical year I spent as a 13-year-old in Paris involved books as well as films.  Every day during our school’s two-hour lunch break, my brothers and I would stop off at the American Library in Paris and check out books. In the film there is an old bookseller who gives Hugo a copy of the Howard Pyle-illustrated Robin Hood.  These were the kinds of books that we were reading so it seems entirely fitting to me that books and movies would come together in a film that evokes my own mythical past.

 

This entry was posted in Hugo (film) and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • http://johnewordslinger.wordpress.com John E. WordSlinger

    Good Morning Mr. Bates,

    this movie caught my attention also. I have not seen it yet.
    I plan to see this film…
    Magical movies are my favorite, nothing in the world compares…

    Good day…

  • Jason

    I was surprised to not see a reference to the book the movie was based on, “The Invention of Hugo Cabret” by Brian Selznick. It won the Caldecot medal in 2008. The pencil illustrations, which encompass most of the book, are wonderful and the way they are framed remind me of how a skilled director frames his shots. The book can be read as if you are watching a silent movie.

    Brian Selznick just released another book, “Wonderstruck”. I have just begun to look at it, but the beginning features a deaf girl watching silent films, so it may interest you as well.

  • Robin Bates

    Thanks for telling me about this, Jason. I’ll definitely check into both books. I went to see the film knowing none of its background.

  • Carl Rosin

    I second Jason’s recommendation, and thank Robin for the writeup. Both The Invention of Hugo Cabret and Hugo were enormously satisfying. My daughter, then 9, read the six-hundred-page book (including many full-page illustrations) several times, which is in itself a high recommendation. When I taught Film Analysis, I showed Cinema Paradiso, a love-letter to the movies; if I get to teach FA again, Hugo will probably have to join it.

  • Pingback: Silence Is Golden in “The Artist”


  • AVAILABLE NOW!

  • Literature is as vital to our lives as food and shelter. Stories and poems help us work through the challenges we face, from everyday irritations to loneliness, heartache, and death. Literature is meant to mix it up with life. This website explores how it does so.

    Please feel free to e-mail me [rrbates (at) smcm (dot) edu]. I would be honored to hear your thoughts and questions about literature.

  • Sign up for weekly newsletter

    Your email will not be shared or sold.
    * = required field

    powered by MailChimp!
  • Twitter Authentication data is incomplete