Sin = Separation from Creation


Henry Fuseli, "Temptation of Eve"

Spiritual Sunday

As I look back over the past few years, I am dissatisfied with how I have been teaching the concept of sin in Doctor Faustus and Paradise Lost. Invariably, it seems, my students just see sin as a matter of breaking an arbitrary set of rules handed down by the church (in Marlowe’s play) or by God (in Milton’s poem). Therefore, they tend to see Faustus as a heroic intellectual bucking established religion (think Galileo) and Eve as a heroic feminist bucking patriarchy. In these interpretations God comes off as narrow-minded, anti-intellectual, and (in Eve’s case) sexist. I try to argue that Marlowe and Milton are not against intellectual exploration but rather against people who use the intellect for selfish rather than for godly purposes. But I feel like I’m swimming against the tide and the journal entries that the students write—especially on Paradise Lost—are among the weakest they produce.

I think I have failed to do full justice to a central contradiction within the human experience that Marlowe and Milton are also wrestling with. That issue is dramatized by Eve’s punishment that she will experience pain during childbirth. (Note: I am particularly attuned to this issue at the moment given that my daughter-in-law Candice is in her 36th week.)

If humans experience a special kind of pain during childbirth it is because, unlike animals, they anticipate it and worry about it. This puts a whole new slant on how eating the fruit of knowledge leads to the punishment meted out to Eve:

Thy sorrow I will greatly multiplie
By thy Conception; Children thou shalt bring
In sorrow forth . . .

Seen anthropologically, what seemed to Milton and the authors of Genesis as a divine punishment is more of a description of what it means to be human. Because of consciousness, humans stand in a different relationship to creation, including to pain. Once we humans were set apart from the rest of the animal kingdom, then our unique track was set. To apply Biblical language, that is what it means that we have inherited Adam’s “original sin.” Children may seem to be born innocent and sinless yet they inevitably develop  this sense of separateness.

Of course, anthropologists tell us that there was no choice in the matter, no Adam and Eve choosing to eat the apple. Instead, they offer up a range of theories about how we evolved into consciousness. The Book of Genesis simply takes note of the fact that the shift happened. That’s the truth to be found in the story, not some literal apple and snake. Genesis also accurately notes the consequences of the shift, how it has led to good and evil, concepts not relevant to animals. Consciousness not only makes us aware of our suffering but leads us to deliberately cause suffering.

So here’s the tension I need to highlight when I teach Marlowe and Milton: intense curiosity, the desire to eat from the tree of knowledge, is integral to what makes us human. We identify with Faustus, Satan, and Eve because they want to push the boundaries. It’s important to affirm our attraction to their adventursome spirit.

But it’s important also to understand how curiosity such as theirs can go wrong. And the response is not to stop being curious and let established authorities like the church do our thinking for us. The answer is to ask ourselves what is the right use of our intellectual curiosity and what is the wrong.

When Milton says about the first two humans “he for God/she for God in him” and when he has Eve serving dinner and sleeping while Adam is being taught by angels (apparently Eve is supposed to be Martha, not Mary), then he is reflecting his culture’s gender hierarchy and his poem doesn’t have a lot to teach us today. But when he says that we can use our reason to move past the separation that consciousness has opened up, then we are getting some place interesting. In Christian terms, this involves calling upon the aid of Jesus so that we can open ourselves to God’s love and thereby possess “a Paradise within thee, happier far.”

Along these lines, Milton’s Adam notes that it is almost good that humans fell (this is the concept of “the fortunate fall”) because they can therefore see more fully, through Christ’s sacrifice, how much God loves us. We would not have realized this if we had stayed forever innocent.

Or using the non-Christian framework of the German philosopher Martin Heidegger, we can move beyond “fallenness” that has us living as alien creatures in the natural world and instead experience the blissful sense of belonging to the unity of nature—a connection that is all the more powerful and joyful because, unlike animals, we have chosen it.

I think, then, when I teach the notion of sin in Doctor Faustus and Paradise Lost in the future, I will focus more on sin as separation rather than as disobeying God. And I will start talking about turning back to God as a stepping into a different relationship to creation, whether we define that creation using religious language, general spiritual language, social language, or environmental language.

If I convey that God represents that sense of union, that overcoming of alienation, then we can move on to start talking about why God gets associated with rules and how it takes disciplined behavior will get us what we most desire. It’s a good conversation to have with people on the verge of adulthood.

I’ll report back in a year and let you know how it went.

This entry was posted in Marlowe (Christopher), Milton (John) and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

3 Comments

  1. Posted May 20, 2012 at 9:02 am | Permalink

    Very interesting post, Robin. I remember reading a commentary by John Walton on Genesis several years ago. He questions whether Adam and Eve are “cursed” as the word is not used in the text. Instead, he “suggest[s] that God’s words are best undertsood as parental in nature, patiently and sadly describing to Adam and Eve the inevitable consequences of the choices they have made for themselves.”

    Another insight from him is that the Hebrew word “pain” used here was not typically associated with physical pain, but rather with mental or psychological anguish. It seems he would be in agreement with your premise, that Eve’s experience of being human (and outside of the garden) will now be tinged with anxiety. As the mother of “the living,” she will feel the anguish and uncertainty of the birthing process and the need to carry on the human race.

    Intererstingly, Paul will pick up on the phrase “pain in childbirth” and say that women who are “saved” (e.g. who are not separate from God anymore) will be kept safe – perhaps their minds will be guarded by peace? – in childbirth.

    I agree that we are meant to be connected fully to the world around us in ways that promote mutual flourishing. In that context, “sin” is anything that keeps that from happening. Walton uses this quote from the movie “Grand Canyon” to describe where we find ourselves now. In the story, a driver gets lost and his car breaks down in a rough neighborhood. Thankfully, a tow truck arrives as the gang members move in. The tow truck driver talks to the gangleader as he puts the car on the truck.

    “Man, the world ain’t supposed to work like this. Maybe you don’t know that, but that ain’t the way it’s supposed to be. I’m supposed to be able to do my job without askin’ you if I can. And that dude is supposed to be able to wait in his car without you rippin’ him off. Everything’s supposed to be different than what it is here.”

    My guess is that we all have a sense that things should be different. It will be interesting to see how your students continue to wrestle with this awareness, and how they make their own choices to move toward that sense of belonging that Heidegger and Milton describe.

  2. Robin Bates
    Posted May 20, 2012 at 11:33 am | Permalink

    What a fabulous response, Sue. I love your example from Grand Canyon, a film I admired a great deal when I saw it. I love the idea of “mutual flourishing” and sin being anything that keeps that from happening. I’ll use that in my class. And what an interesting observation by Paul! In Heidegger’s case, he said that humans’ biggest challenge is death and if we can come to accept our death as union with nature, then we will start accessing this higher joy. Of course, it’s easier said than done.

  3. Posted May 21, 2012 at 6:47 am | Permalink

    Good Mornings Mr. Bates & Sue,

    The post and comments are refreshing and nourishing. It’s truly obvious we are being prepared for something on a higher plane. Sin are truly knocked most senseless and being grateful for so many that have sensed things for the better is very amazing. Sometimes or most times people learn to late, but then again it’s never to late, in some situations for people it just is. I will tell you this from reading your work now for over a year or son, you hand the commentators have re-arranged the garden in my heart, mind, and spirit, furthermore there are others, and and all I can say is thanks to all. Very interesting to see what blooms, and feel extraordinary things rooting… May all of your days be blessed.

    Good Day-

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


  • AVAILABLE NOW!

  • Literature is as vital to our lives as food and shelter. Stories and poems help us work through the challenges we face, from everyday irritations to loneliness, heartache, and death. Literature is meant to mix it up with life. This website explores how it does so.

    Please feel free to e-mail me [rrbates (at) smcm (dot) edu]. I would be honored to hear your thoughts and questions about literature.

  • Sign up for weekly newsletter

    Your email will not be shared or sold.
    * = required field

    powered by MailChimp!
  • Twitter Authentication data is incomplete